The high-profile drama unfolding in Nigeria’s political landscape has taken a dramatic turn as Unoma Akpabio, the wife of Senate President Godswill Akpabio, has filed two separate lawsuits against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. The legal action comes after Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, made public allegations that she was sexually harassed by Akpabio. In response, Mrs. Akpabio is seeking an astronomical sum of ₦250 billion in damages for defamation and violation of her fundamental human rights.
This legal battle highlights the escalating tensions between two prominent figures in Nigerian politics and underscores the complexities surrounding accusations of misconduct in high office. As the case gains traction, it also raises questions about the intersection of personal grievances, public discourse, and accountability in leadership roles.
In the first lawsuit (Suit No: CV/814/25), Unoma Akpabio accuses Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan of making false and scandalous statements that have caused significant emotional distress for herself and her family. According to court documents, these allegations have left her children fearful for their safety and well-being. Mrs. Akpabio argues that such claims not only tarnish her reputation but also infringe upon her constitutional right to dignity as enshrined in Section 34(1)(a) of the Nigerian Constitution and Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
Mrs. Akpabio is demanding that the Federal Capital Territory High Court declare Akpoti-Uduaghan’s statements unconstitutional and a direct violation of her fundamental rights. Beyond declaratory relief, she seeks a perpetual injunction restraining the senator from repeating or disseminating similar damaging claims. Most notably, she is requesting compensation in the form of ₦250 billion—a staggering figure that reflects the gravity with which she views the alleged harm inflicted on her and her family.
The second lawsuit (Suit No: CV/816/25) focuses specifically on defamation. Here, Mrs. Akpabio challenges the veracity of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s claim that her husband, the Senate President, engaged in inappropriate behavior toward her. Describing the allegations as “false, malicious, and damaging,” Mrs. Akpabio contends that they have brought disrepute and public shame to her family name. This suit aims to clear her husband’s name while holding Akpoti-Uduaghan accountable for what she perceives as baseless accusations designed to undermine his integrity and authority.
Defamation cases often hinge on proving the falsity of the statements, their publication, and the resultant harm caused to the plaintiff. In this instance, Mrs. Akpabio must demonstrate that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s allegations were untrue and deliberately intended to damage her family’s reputation. Conversely, Akpoti-Uduaghan may argue that her statements were truthful or made in good faith, thus falling under the protection of free speech guaranteed by the constitution.
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s initial claims gained widespread attention when she publicly accused the Senate President of sexual harassment. Her testimony detailed instances where, according to her account, Akpabio allegedly made unwanted advances toward her during official engagements. These allegations sparked outrage across the nation, prompting calls for greater scrutiny of workplace conduct within the corridors of power.
Akpoti-Uduaghan’s decision to speak out resonated with many Nigerians who have long advocated for stricter measures against sexual harassment and abuse of power. However, her bold stance also drew criticism from some quarters, particularly those skeptical of her motives or concerned about the potential fallout for her career in politics. Critics have questioned whether her timing—amid ongoing political jockeying—was coincidental or strategic.
As the legal proceedings unfold, both parties face immense pressure to substantiate their claims. For Mrs. Akpabio, the stakes are high; securing a favorable judgment would not only vindicate her personally but also reinforce her family’s standing in the political arena. On the other hand, Akpoti-Uduaghan stands to gain credibility if her allegations withstand scrutiny, potentially paving the way for broader reforms addressing gender-based violence and workplace misconduct in Nigeria.
Legal experts note that cases involving public figures often carry additional layers of complexity due to the heightened media scrutiny and societal implications. While the courts will ultimately determine the merits of each side’s argument, the outcome could set important precedents regarding the balance between protecting individual reputations and safeguarding freedom of expression.
Beyond the immediate legal ramifications, this case shines a spotlight on larger issues affecting Nigerian society. It invites critical reflection on how allegations of misconduct are handled, especially when they involve powerful individuals. Many observers hope that this controversy will spur meaningful dialogue about creating safer spaces for victims to come forward without fear of retaliation. At the same time, there is recognition of the need to ensure that accusations are thoroughly investigated before being aired publicly to prevent undue harm to innocent parties.
For now, all eyes remain fixed on the Federal Capital Territory High Court as it navigates the intricate details of these landmark cases. Regardless of the verdict, the proceedings promise to leave an indelible mark on Nigeria’s legal and political landscape, shaping future interactions between citizens, leaders, and the justice system.
As the dust settles, one thing is certain: the ripple effects of this dispute will extend far beyond the courtroom, influencing public perceptions of accountability, integrity, and justice in high places.
