A growing rift within the political landscape of Rivers State has taken a new turn as five federal lawmakers who support Governor Siminalayi Fubara have issued a strong statement condemning their counterparts loyal to former Governor Nyesom Wike. Led by Martin Amaewhule, these lawmakers, who are aligned with Wike’s faction, have been accused of falsely presenting themselves as members of the Rivers State House of Assembly. The tension underscores deep divisions in the state’s political sphere and raises questions about governance, representation, and the future of unity in Rivers.
The dispute stems from the recent reorganization of political alliances following Governor Fubara’s assumption of office after the resignation of former Governor Ezenwo Nyesom Wike. While Governor Fubara enjoys significant backing from key figures within the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and other stakeholders, a faction led by Martin Amaewhule continues to rally behind Wike, despite his departure from active politics. This division has created confusion among residents regarding legitimate representatives and decision-makers within the state assembly.
In their statement, the five federal lawmakers supporting Governor Fubara—namely Senator Magnus Abe, Hon. Emem Okon, Hon. Patrick Ada, Hon. Godwin Etukudo, and Hon. Chinedu Ogbonna—argued that Amaewhule and his group do not hold any official mandate or recognition as members of the Rivers State House of Assembly. They emphasized that these individuals were elected as federal lawmakers representing various constituencies in the National Assembly and therefore cannot simultaneously claim membership in the state legislature.
This is a clear case of misrepresentation,” said Senator Magnus Abe during a press conference held in Port Harcourt. Martin Amaewhule and his allies must stop misleading the public by parading themselves as members of the state assembly when they clearly lack the constitutional authority to act in such capacity.” He further stressed that this behavior undermines the credibility of both the state government and the legislative arm, creating unnecessary friction at a time when collaboration is most needed for development.
The lawmakers also highlighted the importance of respecting democratic processes and institutions. According to them, the current Rivers State House of Assembly comprises duly elected members who represent the interests of the people under Governor Fubara’s leadership. Any attempt to undermine this structure, they warned, could destabilize the region and hinder progress. “We urge all parties involved to prioritize the welfare of our people over personal or partisan ambitions,” added Hon. Emem Okon.
For context, the political dynamics in Rivers State have always been complex due to its strategic economic significance as one of Nigeria’s major oil-producing regions. Control over resources and influence often leads to intense competition among political factions. Former Governor Nyesom Wike wielded considerable power during his tenure, shaping the state’s political scene through strong leadership and patronage networks. However, since stepping down and endorsing Governor Fubara, some of his loyalists appear reluctant to relinquish control, leading to the present impasse.
Martin Amaewhule, speaking on behalf of Wike’s supporters, dismissed the allegations as baseless and politically motivated. In a separate statement, he argued that his group remains committed to safeguarding the principles and values established during Wike’s administration. “Our actions are guided by the best interests of Rivers State and its citizens,” he stated. We will continue to advocate for policies and decisions that align with our vision for sustainable development.”
Despite this stance, critics point out that Amaewhule’s claims lack legal backing. Under Nigeria’s constitution, an individual cannot simultaneously serve in both the National Assembly and a state house of assembly. This prohibition ensures separation of powers and prevents conflicts of interest. As such, the continued assertion of dual roles by Wike loyalists appears to contravene established norms and regulations.
The controversy has sparked widespread debate among residents of Rivers State. Many express frustration with the ongoing political drama, which they feel detracts from addressing pressing issues like infrastructure development, job creation, and security. We elected leaders to work together for our benefit, not to engage in endless squabbles,” remarked Mary Otu, a resident of Port Harcourt. “It’s time for everyone to focus on what truly matters—the needs of the people.”
Others argue that resolving this issue requires intervention from higher authorities, including the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and relevant judicial bodies. Legal experts suggest that clarifying the roles and responsibilities of elected officials may help restore order and prevent similar disputes in the future. There needs to be greater transparency and accountability in how political appointments and mandates are handled,” explained Professor Victor Okorie, a political analyst based in Lagos. Only then can we ensure that democracy thrives without unnecessary distractions.
Governor Fubara himself has remained largely silent on the matter, choosing instead to concentrate on implementing his agenda for the state. Since taking office, he has unveiled several initiatives aimed at improving healthcare, education, and transportation systems. His administration has also prioritized efforts to combat corruption and promote inclusive governance. Despite facing resistance from certain quarters, Fubara remains steadfast in his commitment to delivering results for the people of Rivers State.
As tensions persist, the stakes remain high for all parties involved. For Governor Fubara and his allies, maintaining stability and fostering cooperation within the legislature is crucial for achieving developmental goals. Meanwhile, Wike loyalists must decide whether to reconcile with the current administration or risk alienating themselves from the electorate. Ultimately, the resolution of this conflict will depend on mutual respect, dialogue, and adherence to constitutional principles.
Looking ahead, observers anticipate that the coming months will reveal much about the trajectory of politics in Rivers State. If cooler heads prevail and stakeholders prioritize collective progress over individual gains, there is hope for reconciliation and renewed focus on tackling the challenges facing the region. Conversely, failure to address underlying grievances could lead to prolonged instability, undermining the potential for meaningful transformation.
The call by Governor Fubara’s supporters for Wike loyalists to cease false claims reflects broader tensions within Rivers State’s political environment. While differences of opinion are inevitable in any democracy, it is imperative that all actors approach these disagreements constructively and in good faith. Only through unity and shared purpose can Rivers State realize its full potential and secure a brighter future for its people.
