Solomon Buchi, the outspoken social commentator and relationship adviser, has ignited fresh debate across social media platforms with his provocative stance against modern dating culture. The media personality recently declared that dating and “talking stages” should be eliminated entirely, citing their absence from biblical relationship models.
In a compelling video shared across his social media channels, Buchi presented his argument with characteristic conviction, drawing extensively from biblical narratives to support his position. The footage, which has since garnered significant engagement, features Buchi dissecting the contemporary approach to relationships while contrasting it with what he describes as the more direct and purposeful courtship practices documented in scripture.
“Where in the Bible have you seen someone say ‘I want to know your daughter. I want to get into a talking stage with your daughter’? Men were very intentional. They moved with intention: ‘I want to marry you’,” Buchi stated emphatically in the video, challenging viewers to reconsider normalized relationship progression patterns.
According to Buchi, biblical relationships were characterized by clarity of intention and purpose, with marriage explicitly established as the end goal from the outset. He contends that the modern dating landscape, with its emphasis on casual exploration and extended “getting to know you” phases, represents a significant departure from these traditional models of courtship.
The social commentator specifically highlighted what he perceives as a problematic trend in contemporary relationship culture—the normalization of non-committal “talking stages” that often lack clear direction. Buchi argues that such practices create unnecessary complexity and emotional ambiguity, potentially leading to heartbreak and wasted time for both parties involved.
One of the biggest problems we have in society today is dating,” Buchi remarked, suggesting that humans have unnecessarily complicated the straightforward process of finding a life partner. He maintains that the introduction of multiple relationship stages has created artificial barriers to commitment, enabling individuals to experience the benefits of romantic connections without corresponding levels of responsibility.
Buchi’s perspective appears to align with certain conservative Christian interpretations of relationships, which advocate for courtship models where marriage intentions are established early and physical and emotional intimacy is reserved for marriage. These approaches typically emphasize parental involvement, spiritual compatibility, and minimal romantic experimentation prior to marriage.
His comments have resonated strongly with some religious communities that have long expressed concern about secular dating practices and their potential incompatibility with faith-based values. Many supporters have praised Buchi for articulating what they view as a return to more traditional, scripture-aligned approaches to relationship formation.
However, the statement has also faced substantial criticism from those who argue that contemporary dating serves important purposes in modern society. Critics suggest that dating allows individuals to assess compatibility across multiple dimensions before making life-altering commitments, potentially reducing future divorce rates. Others have pointed out that societal conditions have changed dramatically since biblical times, necessitating different approaches to mate selection.
Mental health professionals and relationship experts have offered mixed responses to Buchi’s position. Some acknowledge the potential benefits of clarity and intentionality in relationships, while others caution against overly rigid approaches that might not accommodate the complexity of human connection or the importance of personal growth through different relationship experiences.
This is not the first time Buchi has shared controversial views on relationships and marriage. The social commentator has built a significant following through his often polarizing perspectives on gender roles, relationship dynamics, and faith-based living. His previous statements about marriage expectations and gender responsibilities have similarly sparked intense discussion across Nigerian social media.
Buchi’s latest declaration comes amid growing conversations about relationship dissatisfaction among younger generations, with many reporting frustration with dating app culture and the seemingly endless cycle of casual connections. Some sociologists have noted a gradual return to more traditional courtship values among certain segments of the population, particularly those affiliated with religious communities.
The debate sparked by Buchi’s statement highlights broader societal tensions between traditional relationship models and contemporary dating practices. It reflects ongoing negotiations between religious values and secular approaches to partnership formation in an increasingly diverse cultural landscape.
As responses to Buchi’s video continue to accumulate, the discussion has expanded beyond its initial religious framing to encompass wider questions about relationship authenticity, emotional health, and the purpose of pre-marital connections. Many commenters, regardless of their position on dating itself, have expressed appreciation for conversations that prompt critical evaluation of normalized relationship patterns.
While Buchi’s position represents one perspective within a spectrum of approaches to relationship formation, its resonance with certain audiences underscores the continued influence of religious frameworks in shaping perspectives on love and marriage, even within increasingly secularized contexts.
Whether viewers ultimately agree with Buchi’s stance or not, his provocative declaration has succeeded in prompting many to reconsider assumptions about relationship progression and to reflect more deeply on the purpose and structure of romantic connections in contemporary society.
