Apostle Niyi Peter found himself before Chief Magistrate Olusegun Ayilara on Thursday, facing charges of defamation and threatening behavior. The cleric is accused of labeling a popular gospel singer, Bunmi Akinnaanu, known professionally as Omije Ojumi, a “prostitute” in a controversial social media post that has ignited a firestorm of debate about the intersection of faith, social media, and personal reputation.
As the sun beat down on the bustling streets of Osogbo, the state capital, curious onlookers gathered outside the magistrate court. Inside, the air was thick with tension as the charges against Apostle Peter were read aloud.
According to the prosecution, led by ASP Akitunde Jacob, the incident occurred in April 2024 at the Oke-Odo Area of Osogbo. The cleric allegedly posted a picture of Akinnaanu on WhatsApp, accompanied by what the authorities describe as an “abusive song.
The defendant’s actions were not just insulting, but potentially dangerous,” ASP Jacob stated, his voice echoing through the hushed courtroom. “By threatening that Ms. Akinnaanu would ‘perish’ and ‘never rise again,’ Apostle Peter crossed a line from mere insult to criminal threat.”
The case against Apostle Peter is multifaceted, touching on several aspects of Osun State’s criminal code:
1. Defamation: Allegedly referring to Akinnaanu as a “prostitute” (Section 373 of the State Criminal Law 2002)
2. Threatening behavior: The voice note suggesting Akinnaanu would “perish” (Section 88(a) of the Criminal Code)
3. Breach of peace: Conduct likely to cause public disturbance (Section 249(D) of the Criminal Code)
Legal expert Adebayo Ogunleye, observing the proceedings, offered his insights: “This case highlights the growing need for clearer legislation around social media use. What might have once been dismissed as a private spat now has serious legal consequences.”
As the charges were read, Apostle Peter, dressed in a somber black suit, stood stoically in the dock. His lawyer, Najite Okobe, immediately entered a plea of not guilty on his client’s behalf.
My client vehemently denies these allegations,” Okobe stated outside the courtroom. “We believe this is a misunderstanding that has been blown out of proportion. Apostle Peter is a respected member of the community, and we are confident that the truth will come to light during the trial.”
While Bunmi Akinnaanu was not present in court, her absence spoke volumes. Friends of the gospel singer, speaking on condition of anonymity, painted a picture of a woman deeply shaken by the incident.
“Bunmi has been singing God’s praises for years,” one close associate shared. To have her character assassinated like this, and by a fellow person of faith, it’s just heartbreaking.
The incident has raised questions about the treatment of women in Nigeria’s religious circles, with some activists seeing it as symptomatic of deeper issues.
As news of the court proceedings spread, Osogbo residents were quick to share their opinions. Outside the courthouse, impromptu debates broke out among bystanders.
If he really said those things, it’s unacceptable,” declared Mary Adeyemi, a local shopkeeper. “Men of God should be building people up, not tearing them down.”
Others, however, urged caution. We don’t know the full story,” argued Taiwo Oladipo, a university student. “Let’s wait for the court to do its job before we judge.”
After hearing arguments from both sides, Chief Magistrate Ayilara made his decision on the matter of bail. In a move that surprised some observers, he granted Apostle Peter bail in the sum of ₦1 million, with two sureties required to match that amount.
“The defendant is hereby admitted to bail,” Ayilara declared, his voice cutting through the murmurs in the courtroom. “However, this case will proceed to trial on October 22nd.”
As Apostle Peter’s supporters rushed to arrange the bail, the gravity of the situation seemed to settle over the courtroom. This was not just about one man’s words, but about the power of social media to harm reputations and the responsibility that comes with religious leadership.
As the dust settles on this initial hearing, legal and social media experts are already weighing in on the broader implications of the case.
Dr. Oluwaseun Adebayo, a digital rights activist, sees this as a watershed moment. This case could set a precedent for how we handle online defamation in Nigeria,” she explained. It’s a wake-up call for everyone to be more mindful of what they post online, regardless of their social or religious status.
The case of Apostle Niyi Peter versus the State of Osun is more than just a local dispute. It touches on issues of free speech, religious authority, and the evolving landscape of digital communication. As the trial date of October 22nd approaches, all eyes will be on Osogbo, waiting to see how justice will be served in this complex and emotionally charged case.
The outcome could have far-reaching implications for how Nigerians use social media, particularly in religious contexts. It serves as a stark reminder that in the digital age, words have power, and with that power comes great responsibility.
