Nigerian former dancehall singer Cynthia Morgan has reignited the national debate over President Tinubu’s economic policies, particularly the removal of fuel subsidies, in a scathing series of posts on her Instagram story. Describing the move as “terrible,” Morgan argued that the sudden abolition of subsidies has exacerbated the cost of living, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable segments of society. Her comments come amid rising discontent over the economic hardships gripping the nation and have sparked renewed discussions about the need for better governance and policy implementation.
Morgan’s critique of Tinubu’s administration began with a direct condemnation of the subsidy removal policy. “Removing 100 percent of the subsidies was a terrible move,” she declared, emphasizing her belief that the decision has worsened an already precarious economic situation. Her comments reflect widespread frustration among Nigerians who have borne the brunt of rising fuel prices, which have rippled through virtually every aspect of daily life, from transportation to food costs.
However, Morgan did not stop at criticism. She also offered a glimmer of hope, suggesting that it is not too late for the government to reverse course and mitigate the damage. “If the cost of fuel is N500, the cost of living will reduce,” she stated, highlighting the interconnected nature of economic policies. “It’s only right that we ease into total subsidy removal with the right development and infrastructure to sustain such decisions.”
Her analogy of a baby transitioning from breast milk to solid food struck a chord with many, emphasizing the need for gradual and measured approaches to policy changes. “A baby can’t go from breast milk to yam in just a day,” she remarked, urging policymakers to consider the human impact of their decisions.
Morgan’s posts echo sentiments expressed by other public figures and citizens alike. Last year, actress Destiny Etiko lamented the increase in fuel prices, questioning what was being done to alleviate the economic hardship plaguing the country. “What is going on?” she asked, expressing her confusion and frustration over the lack of visible efforts to address the crisis. Similarly, Lizzy Gold noted the skyrocketing prices at petrol pumps and the subsequent spike in food costs, appealing to the President to intervene. “People are struggling to survive,” she pleaded, emphasizing the dire need for action.
Yoruba actor Saidi Balogun echoed these concerns, questioning the effectiveness of price controls and regulatory agencies. “Where are the mechanisms to cushion the effects of inflation?” he asked, highlighting the growing disconnect between government policies and the realities faced by ordinary Nigerians. His cries reflect a broader sentiment of disillusionment with the current administration’s ability to manage the nation’s economic challenges.
For many Nigerians, the removal of fuel subsidies has translated into real-life struggles. The cost of transportation has surged, making it increasingly difficult for workers to commute to their jobs. Food prices have skyrocketed, pushing staples like rice and bread beyond the reach of low-income households. The ripple effects have been felt across all sectors, exacerbating poverty and inequality.
Morgan’s posts serve as a reminder of the human toll of poorly executed policies. “Abeg consider us,” she implored, appealing to the President and policymakers to recognize the plight of ordinary citizens. Her plea resonates with countless families who are struggling to make ends meet in an economy where basic necessities have become luxuries.
Morgan’s critique is not just about criticizing Tinubu’s policies; it is also about advocating for a more pragmatic approach to governance. She acknowledges that reversing the subsidy removal entirely may not be feasible, but she insists that the government must adopt a phased approach, ensuring that infrastructure and development projects are in place to support the transition.
“Easing into total subsidy removal with the right development and infrastructure” is her prescription for addressing the current crisis. This approach aligns with broader calls for better planning and execution, suggesting that the government must prioritize long-term solutions over short-term fixes.
Morgan’s intervention highlights the growing role of public figures in shaping public discourse. As celebrities and influencers, figures like her, Destiny Etiko, Lizzy Gold, and Saidi Balogun have significant sway over public opinion. Their ability to articulate grievances and propose solutions amplifies the voices of those who feel disenfranchised by the current administration.
Their interventions also underscore the importance of accountability in governance. When policies fail to deliver results, citizens expect leaders to take responsibility and adjust their strategies accordingly. Morgan’s call for action is a reminder that leadership involves more than just rhetoric—it requires tangible efforts to improve people’s lives.
As Nigeria grapples with its economic challenges, the conversation initiated by Cynthia Morgan and others must continue. The government must heed the warnings of its citizens and adopt policies that prioritize human welfare over ideological purity. Subsidy removal, while theoretically sound, must be implemented with care and consideration for the most vulnerable.
For now, the debate rages on, with Morgan’s posts serving as a clarion call for change. As the nation waits for action, the question remains: Will Tinubu heed the warnings, or will the cries for reform fall on deaf ears?
