Former Nigerian presidential candidate Peter Obi has strongly criticized the imposition of emergency rule in Rivers State, describing the move as “unconstitutional and reckless.” The Labour Party leader, known for his outspoken stance on governance and rule of law, issued a scathing rebuke of the decision, warning that it undermines democracy and sets a dangerous precedent for the country. His comments come amid escalating political tensions in Rivers State, where a protracted power struggle between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, has plunged the state into crisis.
The call for emergency rule in Rivers State has sparked widespread debate across Nigeria, with many questioning the legality and necessity of such a measure. Proponents argue that the move is necessary to restore order and stability in the state, which has been rocked by violent clashes, protests, and a breakdown of governance. However, critics, including Peter Obi, view it as an overreach of power and a threat to the democratic principles enshrined in Nigeria’s constitution.
In a statement released to the press, Obi did not mince words. “The declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State is not only unconstitutional but also reckless,” he said. “It represents a blatant disregard for the rule of law and the rights of the people. Democracy thrives on the principles of due process, transparency, and respect for constitutional mandates. Any attempt to subvert these principles must be resisted by all well-meaning Nigerians.”
Obi’s condemnation reflects growing concerns about the state of governance in Nigeria, particularly in regions where political rivalries have led to instability. Rivers State, a key economic hub in the Niger Delta, has been at the center of a bitter feud between Governor Fubara and Nyesom Wike, the current Minister of the Federal Capital Territory. The conflict, which stems from a struggle for control of the state’s political machinery, has resulted in widespread unrest, including attacks on public institutions and clashes between rival factions.
The crisis reached a boiling point in recent weeks, prompting calls for federal intervention. Supporters of emergency rule argue that the situation in Rivers State poses a significant threat to national security and economic stability. The state is home to critical oil and gas infrastructure, and any disruption to its operations could have far-reaching consequences for Nigeria’s economy. However, opponents, including Peter Obi, contend that the imposition of emergency rule is a politically motivated move that could exacerbate tensions rather than resolve them.
“Emergency rule should never be used as a tool to settle political scores or suppress dissent,” Obi said. “It is a measure of last resort, to be employed only in the most extreme circumstances where there is a clear and present danger to the lives and property of citizens. What we are seeing in Rivers State is a political crisis, not a security emergency. The solution lies in dialogue, not in the suspension of democratic institutions.”
Obi’s remarks have resonated with many Nigerians, particularly those who view the crisis in Rivers State as a symptom of deeper systemic issues. The country’s political landscape has long been characterized by intense rivalries and a winner-takes-all mentality, often at the expense of good governance and public welfare. The situation in Rivers State is seen as a microcosm of these challenges, with the power struggle between Fubara and Wike threatening to derail development and exacerbate social tensions.
The former Anambra State governor also called on President Bola Tinubu to exercise caution and prioritize the rule of law in addressing the crisis. “The federal government has a responsibility to uphold the constitution and protect the rights of all Nigerians,” Obi said. “Any action taken in Rivers State must be guided by the principles of justice, fairness, and respect for democratic norms. The people of Rivers State deserve peace and stability, not the imposition of authoritarian measures.”
Obi’s intervention has added a new dimension to the debate over emergency rule, with many Nigerians taking to social media to express their views. While some have echoed his concerns about the potential abuse of power, others have argued that decisive action is needed to prevent further deterioration of the situation in Rivers State. The controversy has also reignited discussions about the need for comprehensive political reforms to address the root causes of instability in Nigeria.
As the debate rages on, the people of Rivers State continue to bear the brunt of the crisis. Businesses have been disrupted, schools have been closed, and many residents live in fear of violence. The state’s political leaders have been urged to prioritize the welfare of their constituents and seek a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
For Peter Obi, the crisis in Rivers State is a stark reminder of the challenges facing Nigeria’s democracy. “We cannot afford to take our democracy for granted,” he said. “It is a fragile system that requires constant vigilance and active participation from all citizens. The events in Rivers State should serve as a wake-up call for all of us to demand accountability, transparency, and respect for the rule of law from our leaders.”
As Nigeria navigates this latest political storm, the words of Peter Obi serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of upholding democratic principles. The imposition of emergency rule in Rivers State may have been intended to restore order, but it has also raised critical questions about the future of governance in Africa’s most populous nation. For now, the focus remains on finding a peaceful and constitutional resolution to the crisis, one that prioritizes the interests of the people and strengthens the foundations of Nigeria’s democracy.
