Former Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir El-Rufai, has disclosed that he consistently sought the input and approval of former President Muhammadu Buhari in all his major political decisions during his tenure. This revelation sheds light on the intricacies of Nigerian politics, particularly the deep-seated influence wielded by key figures within the ruling party, even in state-level governance. El-Rufai’s admission underscores the often-blurred lines between federal authority and state autonomy, raising questions about leadership independence and the dynamics of power within the All Progressives Congress (APC).
El-Rufai, known for his outspoken nature and reformist agenda, made the disclosure during a recent public engagement where he reflected on his eight-year tenure as governor of Kaduna State. The former governor, who positioned himself as a champion of transparency and accountability, explained that consulting with Buhari was not merely a formality but a deliberate strategy to ensure alignment with national policies and foster cohesion within the APC. He emphasized that such consultations were crucial in navigating the complexities of governance in a politically fragmented nation like Nigeria.
The relationship between El-Rufai and Buhari dates back several years, with both leaders sharing ideological similarities rooted in their commitment to anti-corruption campaigns and economic reforms. El-Rufai served as a key ally to Buhari during the latter’s presidential campaigns, playing an instrumental role in shaping the APC’s policy framework. This longstanding partnership, according to El-Rufai, created a strong foundation of trust and mutual respect, making it natural for him to seek Buhari’s counsel on critical matters affecting Kaduna State.
El-Rufai recounted instances where Buhari’s guidance proved invaluable, particularly in resolving disputes within the state’s political landscape and addressing challenges related to infrastructure development. He cited the example of securing federal funding for road projects and other developmental initiatives, which required coordination with the federal government. By aligning Kaduna State’s priorities with those of the presidency, El-Rufai argued that he was able to secure significant investments that accelerated progress in areas such as education, healthcare, and transportation.
However, this reliance on Buhari’s approval has sparked debates about the extent to which state governors should defer to federal authorities in decision-making processes. Critics argue that while collaboration between state and federal governments is essential, excessive dependence on presidential endorsement risks undermining the principles of federalism enshrined in Nigeria’s constitution. They contend that such practices could stifle innovation and discourage governors from taking bold, independent actions tailored to the unique needs of their states.
Supporters of El-Rufai, on the other hand, view his approach as pragmatic and necessary given the realities of Nigerian politics. In a system characterized by intense rivalries and factionalism, maintaining strong ties with influential leaders like Buhari can provide stability and facilitate smoother implementation of policies. Moreover, they point out that El-Rufai’s achievements in Kaduna State—ranging from educational reforms to infrastructural advancements—are testament to the effectiveness of his collaborative leadership style.
Despite these accomplishments, El-Rufai’s tenure was not without controversy. His administration faced criticism over allegations of human rights abuses, particularly regarding the handling of religious and ethnic tensions in the state. Some opponents accused him of prioritizing political expediency over justice, suggesting that his close association with Buhari may have influenced certain decisions perceived as heavy-handed or divisive. El-Rufai has consistently defended his record, asserting that his actions were guided by a commitment to peace, security, and sustainable development.
The former governor’s revelations also highlight broader issues concerning the internal dynamics of the APC. As one of the party’s most prominent figures, El-Rufai’s acknowledgment of Buhari’s influence reflects the hierarchical structure that often defines Nigerian political parties. While this centralized approach can promote unity and coherence, it also raises concerns about the marginalization of dissenting voices and the suppression of alternative perspectives within the party ranks.
Looking ahead, El-Rufai’s statements come at a pivotal moment for Nigeria as the country grapples with mounting socioeconomic challenges and prepares for future elections. With Buhari having completed his second term and stepped down from active politics, questions linger about how the APC will navigate its post-Buhari era. Will the party continue to operate under a similar top-down model, or will it embrace more decentralized forms of leadership? These uncertainties underscore the need for introspection and reform within the APC if it hopes to maintain its relevance in an increasingly competitive political environment.
For El-Rufai personally, the disclosure adds another layer to his evolving legacy. Having left office earlier this year, he remains a polarizing yet influential figure in Nigerian politics. His willingness to openly discuss his relationship with Buhari demonstrates a level of candor that is rare among political elites. Whether this transparency will enhance his credibility or expose vulnerabilities remains to be seen.
As Nigerians reflect on El-Rufai’s remarks, the conversation inevitably shifts to larger questions about governance, accountability, and the balance of power in a federal system. While seeking guidance from experienced leaders like Buhari is undoubtedly beneficial, it is equally important for elected officials to exercise independent judgment and prioritize the interests of their constituents. Striking this delicate balance is no easy feat, but it is essential for fostering resilient institutions and ensuring equitable development across all levels of society.
El-Rufai’s admission of seeking Buhari’s approval in all his political decisions offers valuable insights into the workings of modern Nigerian politics. It highlights the interplay between loyalty and leadership, tradition and innovation, centralization and decentralization. As the nation charts its course forward, policymakers and citizens alike must engage in thoughtful dialogue about how best to strengthen democratic governance while upholding the values of inclusivity and self-determination. Only then can Nigeria fulfill its immense potential and address the myriad challenges confronting its people.
