A paternity dispute involving prominent Nigerian socialite Cubana Chief Priest has intensified as his alleged baby mama demands DNA testing be conducted outside Nigeria’s borders, citing concerns over the credibility of local testing facilities.
The controversy, which has captivated social media audiences, reached a new level when the woman, a mother of two, took to Instagram to publicly challenge the celebrity barman. In her bold declaration, she specifically requested that any paternity testing be conducted either in Kenya or the United Kingdom, expressing deep skepticism about the reliability of Nigerian DNA testing processes.
Whether you like it or not, we will do DNA. Come and do DNA in Kenya, or we could go to the UK, because I don’t trust Nigeria’s DNA process. I can never trust that when it comes to DNA,” she stated firmly in her social media address, demonstrating her unwavering stance on the matter.
The demand for international testing has sparked mixed reactions across social media platforms, with many questioning the practicality and logistics of such an arrangement. User @itsfredor humorously questioned the location of the alleged relationship, asking, “Na for UK or Kenya una knack?” while @ritajohnson___ raised practical concerns about travel expenses, commenting, “Germany or UK, who go sponsor the trip?
Adding another layer of intrigue to the unfolding drama, some social media users pointed out inconsistencies in the woman’s recent activities. @kween_mandy_ noted, “She was hospitalized some days ago how come she set camera on,” raising questions about the timing and authenticity of her claims.
The controversy has highlighted broader issues surrounding paternity testing in Nigeria and the perceived reliability of local medical facilities. The woman’s insistence on international testing venues reflects a common concern among Nigerians about the credibility of domestic medical services, particularly in high-stakes situations involving prominent public figures.
This public confrontation represents a growing trend of social media being used as a platform for airing personal grievances involving celebrities. The woman’s strategic use of Instagram to make her demands has effectively forced the issue into the public domain, creating pressure for resolution while generating significant public interest in the outcome.
The situation has also sparked discussions about responsibility and accountability in Nigeria’s entertainment industry, with some social media users viewing the controversy as part of a larger pattern of paternity disputes involving public figures. User @tete9ja’s comment that “She don wake up from coma just now just now” reflects the skepticism some harbor about the timing and motivation behind such claims.
As the story continues to develop, observers are particularly interested in how Cubana Chief Priest will respond to these public demands. His reaction, or lack thereof, could significantly influence public perception and potentially set precedents for how similar situations are handled in the future.
The controversy also raises important questions about privacy, public accountability, and the role of social media in resolving personal disputes. While some view the public nature of the confrontation as necessary for achieving justice, others see it as a concerning trend in how private matters are increasingly being played out in the public sphere.
Public reaction to the situation continues to evolve, with some social media users offering support for the woman’s demands while others question her motives and approach. User @tekena_otobo’s comment that “Please o it’s gonna better for him o” suggests that some believe resolution of the matter would be in everyone’s best interest.
As this story continues to unfold, it serves as a compelling example of how personal disputes involving public figures can quickly become matters of widespread public interest and debate. The outcome of this situation could potentially influence how similar cases are approached in the future, particularly regarding the perceived reliability of domestic versus international medical testing facilities.